Theodosius, Heraclea Type 60, for Johannes and Theodosius II,
is
similar, but much cruder, and dates to the reign of Johannes, 423-425.
RIC IX photos: V2-X.20 (Th), A-XVI.18 (Nic, with cross on
shield left).
RIC X Arcadius 1327 ("Aquileia, C, 395-402". p.322), 1245-6
("Rome, C2, S, AD 395-403." p. 324)
RIC X Honorius 1238 ("Aquileia, C, 395-402" p. 322), 1247-9
("Rome, C2, C, R2, AD 395-403," p. 324 ")
RIC X, 2106 for Valentinian III is "R5" and, according to the
footnote "perhaps a mule with Johannes reverse." It has cross-rho in
field and "PLA" in the obverse legend, proving it is Valentianian III.
But I do not think it is an official type belonging in the main table.
For Honorius, at Rome only, the obverse legend "DN ONORIVS PF AVG" without the "H" is found [RIC Rome 64e, C3, p. 134]. Pearce saw "many hundreds" at Richborough [p. 114].
DO for Arcadius: Very common, 47 pieces in Table 21, "Eastern
AE4, 386-393," p. 113, none in Table 22, "Italian mints, 388-391," p.
114, 2 in Table 25, "Eastern AE, 393-395," none in Table 26, "Western,
392-395," and 3 in Table 31, "Western AE, 394-408 ["393-402"]," page
131.
DO for Honorius, 3 pieces in Table 35, "Eastern AE, 393-395,"
page 197, and none in Table 39, "Western AE, 395-423," "395-402(?) and
408-409," page 207.
xx Why "386" for the beginning date in DO?
Look this up.
Comment: Good examples of Valentinian II, Theodosius, and Arcadius are common, but very rare for Honorius.
Cayon V2-75 (3 photos, Ant, xx, xx), T-70 (3 photos, Cyz,
Con,
xx), A-57 (2 photos, xx, Con), H-66,67 (0), T2-43 (0).
Hunter V2-84.37 (Her), V2-84.38 (Her), V2-84.44 (Cyz), T-86.42
(Con), A-92.23 (Her), A-93.41 (Cyz).
Ratto photos, Arcadius 93, 98, 101, 102.